Bank War | Andrew Jackson, Nicholas Biddle & Economic Impact (2024)

United States history

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

Print

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Bank War | Andrew Jackson, Nicholas Biddle & Economic Impact (2)

Bank War, in U.S. history, the struggle between President Andrew Jackson and Nicholas Biddle, president of the Bank of the United States, over the continued existence of the only national banking institution in the nation during the second quarter of the 19th century. The first Bank of the United States, chartered in 1791 over the objections of Thomas Jefferson, ceased in 1811 when Jeffersonian Republicans refused to pass a new federal charter. In 1816 the second Bank of the United States was created, with a 20-year federal charter.

In 1829 and again in 1830 Jackson made clear his constitutional objections and personal antagonism toward the bank. He believed it concentrated too much economic power in the hands of a small monied elite beyond the public’s control. For support, Biddle turned to the National Republicans—especially Henry Clay and Daniel Webster—turning the issue into a political battle. On their advice, Biddle applied for a new charter even though the old charter did not expire until 1836.

The recharter bill easily passed both houses of Congress in 1832. Saying “The bank is trying to kill me, but I will kill it,” Jackson issued a potent veto message. The fate of the bank then became the central issue of the presidential election of 1832 between Jackson and Clay. Jackson concluded from his victory in that election that he had a mandate not only to refuse the bank a new charter but to destroy as soon as possible what he called a “hydra of corruption.” (Many of his political enemies had loans from the bank or were on its payroll.)

Jackson ordered that no more government funds be deposited in the bank. Existing deposits were consumed paying off expenses, while new revenues were placed in 89 state “pet banks.” Biddle responded by calling in loans and thus precipitating a credit shortage and business downturn. Clay in 1834 pushed a resolution through the Senate censuring Jackson for removing the deposits.

Jackson held firm. Biddle was eventually forced to relax the bank’s credit policies, and in 1837 the Senate expunged the censure resolution from its record. When the bank’s federal charter finally expired, Biddle secured a state charter from Pennsylvania to keep the bank operating. But in 1841 it went out of business, the result of faulty investment decisions and national economic distress.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Amy Tikkanen.

Bank War | Andrew Jackson, Nicholas Biddle & Economic Impact (2024)

FAQs

What were the effects of Jackson's war against Mr Biddle and the bank? ›

The people were with Jackson, and he was overwhelmingly elected to a second term. Biddle retaliated by making it more difficult for businesses and others to get the money they needed. This caused an economic contraction at the end of 1833 and into 1834. The bank charter expired in 1836.

What was the result of the Jackson's war on the bank responses? ›

The Bank War was a political struggle that developed over the issue of rechartering the Second Bank of the United States (B.U.S.) during the presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829–1837). The affair resulted in the shutdown of the Bank and its replacement by state banks.

What effects did Jackson's Bank War have on the economy? ›

The most major effect of the Bank War of 1832 was inflation throughout the United States. It also resulted in periodic economic panics that only ceased in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve.

What was Nicholas Biddle's role in the Bank War? ›

In response, Biddle restricted the Bank's loans, tightening the nation's money supply in an effort to inspire public outrage toward Jackson's policies and force the recharter. Instead, Biddle's plan backfired, and the ensuing financial distress inspired greater suspicion of the Bank's power.

How did Andrew Jackson affect the Bank War? ›

This bill passed Congress, but Jackson vetoed it, declaring that the Bank was "unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive to the rights of States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people." After his reelection, Jackson announced that the Government would no longer deposit Federal funds with the Bank and would ...

How did Andrew Jackson's veto of the National bank impact the American economy? ›

The removal of the government's deposits crippled the federal bank, and it dissolved in 1836. The next year, another financial panic, the Panic of 1837, swept the country.

Who did Biddle blame for the financial crisis? ›

The Bank of the United States, not to be left out, was blamed for bankrolling Jackson's opposition. (Ironically, Biddle himself had voted for Jackson). The bitterness that followed the election of 1824 closed the so-called “Era of Good Feelings” that had defined American politics in the years after the War of 1812.

How did Jackson's Bank War change the United States economy quizlet? ›

The economy suffered without a national bank. State banks made too many loans and issued too much money. This caused an increase in spending and led to rising prices.

What is the significance of Andrew Jackson's actions during the Bank War quizlet? ›

Andrew Jackson led the nation into an economic depression by ridding of the National Bank. He expanded the gap between the North and South states with the Nullification Act, which hindered at the South's trade with Europe. He also treated Native and African Americans horribly, creating the trail of tears.

What did Biddle do to punish Jackson? ›

Jackson's decision to divert federal deposits prompted his adversaries in the Senate to formally censure his actions as arbitrary and unconstitutional. The bank's president, Nicholas Biddle (1786-1944), responded to Jackson's actions by reducing loans and calling in debts.

What was the economic impact of Jackson's policies? ›

Following the credit crunch, the economy endured a bout of inflation—with prices rising 28 percent from 1833 to 1836, which critics of Jackson attributed to the easy-money policies of the banking sector, which was no longer required to practice sound money policies because the BUS was no longer there to rein it in.

What did Jackson do to the Bank of the United States and how did it impact the United States? ›

Shortly after the election, Jackson ordered that federal deposits be removed from the second National Bank and put into state banks. Although Jackson's order met with heavy criticism from members of his administration, most of the government's money had been moved out of the Bank by late 1833.

Why was Biddle bad? ›

Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen argued that Jackson's opposition was more political than philosophical: "What made Biddle dangerous...was not his capabilities as a bank president, but his political powers of patronage in a large institution with branches in many states - all with the power to lend.

How did the Bank War influence the economy and party competition? ›

How did the Bank War influence the economy and party competition? It increased wages, prices, and increased the value of money but this boom ended quickly causing a massive decline in the value of money. With this happened in politics the hard money, anti-bank wing of the Democratic Party came to power.

What was the Bank War between Jackson and Biddle? ›

Bank War, in U.S. history, the struggle between President Andrew Jackson and Nicholas Biddle, president of the Bank of the United States, over the continued existence of the only national banking institution in the nation during the second quarter of the 19th century.

What was the result of the destruction of the National bank? ›

After the banks destruction, banking returned to being a decentralised business in which institutions were chartered by the individual states. The banks defeat also had profound implications for the role of the state in America in managing monetary policy.

What happened as a result of bank closures and the Panic of 1837? ›

The Panic of 1837 was a financial crisis in the United States that began a major depression (not to be confused with the Great Depression), which lasted until the mid-1840s. Profits, prices, and wages dropped, westward expansion was stalled, unemployment rose, and pessimism abounded.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nathanael Baumbach

Last Updated:

Views: 6028

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nathanael Baumbach

Birthday: 1998-12-02

Address: Apt. 829 751 Glover View, West Orlando, IN 22436

Phone: +901025288581

Job: Internal IT Coordinator

Hobby: Gunsmithing, Motor sports, Flying, Skiing, Hooping, Lego building, Ice skating

Introduction: My name is Nathanael Baumbach, I am a fantastic, nice, victorious, brave, healthy, cute, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.