Correspondent, Intermediary & Beneficiary Banks Difference (2024)

Whether you're a business with global ties or an individual seeking clarity on international payments, it's important to understand the roles of Correspondent, Intermediary, and Beneficiary Banks. These three entities are central to global transactions. By knowing their specific functions and the processes that lie behind international payments, you'll be better equipped to make informed financial decisions.

What is Correspondent Banking?

Correspondent banking is a partnership between two banks, often from different countries, where one bank provides services on behalf of another bank. In this arrangement, the bank offering the services is called the "correspondent bank," while the bank receiving them is the "respondent bank."

What is a Intermediary Bank?

An intermediary bank serves as a link between the originating bank (where the transaction starts) and the beneficiary bank (where the transaction is meant to end). It plays a vital role, especially when the two banks conducting business don't have a direct relationship with each other.

What is a Beneficiary Bank?

A beneficiary bank is a financial institution where the intended recipient of a funds transfer holds a bank account. It's where the money is destined to go in financial transactions. In banking terms, the beneficiary refers to the individual or entity that is the end recipient of the funds.

Difference between Correspondent and Intermediary banks

Correspondent, Intermediary & Beneficiary Banks Difference (1)

In the intricate realm of international banking, correspondent banks and intermediary banks play indispensable roles, especially when navigating cross-border transfers. Correspondent banks typically work as a representative for another financial institution, often stepping in when that institution lacks a foothold in a specific region. Their primary role is to simplify international money movements, holding funds and directly executing transactions for other financial institutions they represent. For instance, a bank in the US might leverage its correspondent banking relationship with a UK bank to facilitate USD-denominated transfers between the two nations.

Conversely, the intermediary banks emerge as a third party, a bridge when the originating and beneficiary bank don't share a direct link. Acting as the middleman in the financial chain, they ensure funds travel securely and reach their intended endpoint, even in scenarios where multiple stopovers are necessary due to the absence of direct banking relationships. An example could be a small regional bank needing assistance from larger banks to process an international transfer.

In essence, while both these entities benefit the smooth flow of a cross-border transaction, their roles diverge at the operational level. The correspondent bank extends its facilities directly, offering its services in regions where its partner banks are not present. Meanwhile, the intermediary bank patches indirect routes, ensuring transactions aren't halted by the lack of direct bank-to-bank relationships. If a transaction involves an intermediary bank, it means there are 3 or more participants in the chain.

What is Nostro and Vostro?

Nostro and vostro are banking terms used to describe different types of accounts held between banks, primarily for international transactions.

A nostro account is one that a bank holds in a foreign country, in that country's currency; essentially, it's "our account with you." For instance, a US bank might have a nostro account in the UK in pounds sterling.

Conversely, a vostro account is the opposite — "your account with us." Using the same example, the UK bank would view the same account as a vostro account, meaning an account held by the US bank in the UK. These accounts facilitate smooth cross-border transactions and clearances.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of correspondent banking?

Correspondent banking relationships refer to an agreement between two financial institutions where one performs services on behalf of the other. This is commonly used to facilitate international financial transactions, where local banks establish relationships with foreign banks to provide services in those countries. Here's a breakdown of the advantages and disadvantages of correspondent banking relationships:

Advantages:

Access to Foreign Markets

Correspondent banking provides local banks with access to foreign financial markets and currency exchange without the need to establish branches overseas.

Cost Efficiency

Establishing and maintaining a physical presence for a bank in a foreign country can be costly. Through a correspondent relationship, banks can serve their clients in foreign markets without incurring these high costs.

Risk Management

Engaging in direct foreign operations can be risky. Correspondent banking allows domestic banks to move foreign currency and provide international services while delegating many of the operational risks to the correspondent bank.

Expedited Transactions

Correspondent banks often expedite transactions between banks, reducing the time clients have to wait for international payments or transactions.

Local Expertise

The correspondent bank in the foreign country typically has more in-depth knowledge about local regulations, market conditions, and customs. This knowledge can be invaluable for domestic banks and their clients.

Disadvantages:

Dependence

If a correspondent bank faces operational, financial, or legal challenges, it can impact the financial services being offered by the domestic bank, financial institution or payment service provider to its clients, sometimes even leading to customer account closures.

Diluted Customer Relationship

The direct relationship between a beneficiary bank vs correspondent bank might get diluted. For instance, if there's a problem with a transaction, the domestic bank may have to liaise with the correspondent bank, adding layers of communication and potential delays.

Operational Risks

While some risks are delegated to the correspondent bank, new operational risks emerge. These can be due to potential errors, fraud, or inefficiencies on the part of the correspondent bank.

Compliance and Regulatory Challenges

Correspondent banking can introduce compliance risks, especially regarding anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT). Regulators globally are focusing more on these areas, which can place additional compliance burdens on banks around the world.

Limited Control

Domestic banks might have limited control over the correspondent bank's operations, which can lead to variability in service quality and customer experience.

Reduction in Correspondent Relationships

Due to increased regulatory scrutiny and the associated costs, the banks globally have been continuously reducing their correspondent banking relationships, a phenomenon known as "de-risking." This can limit the options available for banks looking to establish new relationships.

Are there any transaction fees?

All members of the chain facilitating the payment can deduct different fees for their services – payment processing and currency exchange if required. The originating bank usually charges a separate transfer fee from the sender's account while intermediary and recipient banks often deduct their charges from the transfer amount, which can lead to the recipient receiving less than the original sum sent.

Some banks offer senders control over cost bearing, allowing to choose between OUR, SHA and BEN payment types.

  • OUR: The sender pays all fees (originating, receiving and intermediary fees). The beneficiary receives the full payment amount.
  • SHA (Shared): The sender pays the originator bank fees, and the beneficiary pays the receiving charges. Intermediary bank fees might be deducted from the principal amount, so the beneficiary might receive less than the original amount sent.
  • BEN: The beneficiary pays all fees. The sender sends the money, but all the transaction fees are deducted from the payment, resulting in the beneficiary receiving a reduced amount.

To avoid unexpected transaction costs, it's essential to understand these fees when making or receiving international payments. Check this article for a detailed example where we illustrate the potential charges on a £10,000 transfer from a UK bank to a bank in Canada.

Avoid correspondent bank fees with MultiPass

Correspondent, Intermediary & Beneficiary Banks Difference (2)

As our world becomes a global village, understanding the nuances of international payments and related fees is crucial – especially for businesses with foreign partners, suppliers or clients. Many might not be aware that certain expenses tied to traditional banks, such as high exchange fees and intermediary charges, are entirely avoidable. At MultiPass, we're here to make international payments simpler and more transparent. Here are two key ways we help businesses save money:

Take control over the exchange rate. A substantial portion of costs stems from unfavourable exchange rates, which can significantly erode profit margins. This is especially important for businesses operating on slim margins, like dropshippers or resellers. A single payment to a supplier at an unfavourable rate can be so costly that it could make the whole business deal pointless. With MultiPass, you can access bank-beating exchange rates for 30+ currencies, and convert money only when required, keeping them in a multi-currency account and avoiding needless further conversions.

Use local payment methods. Using local payment methods in different markets can be a significant cost-saver compared to the traditional SWIFT network used by most banks for international payments. With MultiPass you can pay directly in the recipient's currency using local rails, be it ACH in the US, SEPA in the EU or 20+ other payment methods. These methods used by locals are often up to 40 times more affordable (starting from just £1 per payment as opposed to £10-£40 with traditional banks) and can be processed within a day or even instantly.

Whether you're a business aiming for overseas expansion or have existing multi-currency flows, take charge of your international transactions with MultiPass. With our expert guidance and dedicated personal manager support, navigating global payments becomes a breeze. Apply today or contact us to discuss your business case!

Correspondent, Intermediary & Beneficiary Banks Difference (2024)

FAQs

Correspondent, Intermediary & Beneficiary Banks Difference? ›

A person or entity has an account at an issuing bank. The issuing bank then uses a correspondent or intermediary bank to complete the process of moving funds to a beneficiary bank. In some countries, correspondent banks are simply a type of intermediary bank.

What is the difference between beneficiary and correspondent bank? ›

A correspondent bank is a go-between for two different respondent banks in an international financial transaction. A beneficiary bank is the bank that receives money from a sender bank through a third-party intermediary bank.

What is an intermediary and beneficiary bank? ›

An intermediary bank is a bank that acts on behalf of the sender bank. You always need to provide the beneficiary bank details as the final beneficiary for your payment, never the intermediary bank details. Otherwise, your payment may not be received. Please carefully follow the bank instructions we provide.

What is the difference between beneficial bank and intermediary bank? ›

Additional tips for creating wires: • “beneficiary” is the person/entity you are sending the wire to. “beneficiary bank” or “beneficiary FI (financial institution)” is the final bank you are sending the wire to. “intermediary bank” is either a domestic or international bank assisting as a 3rd party or go-between.

What is the difference between correspondent bank and intermediary bank? ›

While correspondent banks normally handle transactions involving multiple currencies, an intermediary bank completes transactions involving only a single currency. They are especially key for domestic banks that may be too small in size to handle these types of transactions.

Why do banks use intermediary banks? ›

‍An intermediary bank acts as a kind of 'middleman' in an international transaction. It bridges the gap between two different bank accounts (held by two different banks, in two different countries) to ensure smooth, speedy, and seamless cross-border payments.

Why do banks use correspondent banks? ›

Through correspondent banking relationships, banks can access financial services in different jurisdictions and provide cross-border payment services to their customers, supporting international trade and financial inclusion.

What is an example of an intermediary bank? ›

An Example of an Intermediary Bank

They are also one of the world's largest banks with connections to accounts and countries all over the world. In this case, HSBC can receive money from a UK-based bank and then facilitate the transfer to the Asian bank of the recipient.

What is a beneficiary bank? ›

A beneficiary can be a person, or a business entity. A beneficiary bank is the bank which holds the account you're sending money to. So if you're sending money to your brother - your beneficiary - who banks with Citibank in the US, Citibank is the beneficiary bank.

What is a correspondent bank? ›

A correspondent bank is a third-party financial institution that acts as an intermediary between domestic and international banks. Correspondent banks effectively act as an agent of a foreign bank to conduct business transactions with the domestic bank on its behalf.

Do I need a correspondent bank? ›

Correspondent banks provide an invaluable service to traditional banks which need to process international payments through the SWIFT network. However, SWIFT payments are typically slow and expensive, and may not be the best way to get your money where it needs to be.

What does it mean when a bank is a financial intermediary? ›

Financial intermediaries provide a middle ground between two parties in any financial transaction. A prime example would be a bank, which serves many different roles: it acts as a middleman between a borrower and a lender, and pools together funds for investment.

Do you require an intermediary correspondent bank? ›

An intermediary bank is required when making international funds transfers between the originator bank and the beneficiary bank. This only happens when the banks don't have an established relationship, such as an account that would otherwise facilitate a direct deposit in a SWIFT network.

Is Chase an intermediary bank? ›

The intermediary banks that each financial institution uses can vary. However, these are generally well-established banks with an international presence. For instance, JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as the intermediary for USD transactions, Royal Bank of Scotland for GBP, and PT Bank DBS Indonesia for IDR.

Why is correspondent banking high risk? ›

Risks associated with correspondent banking

Correspondent banks may have no pre-existing relationships with parties with which the respondent transacts, making them vulnerable to corruption and money laundering.

What is the meaning of correspondent bank? ›

A correspondent bank is a third-party financial institution that acts as an intermediary between domestic and international banks. Correspondent banks effectively act as an agent of a foreign bank to conduct business transactions with the domestic bank on its behalf.

What is the meaning of correspondent banking? ›

A correspondent bank is a third-party financial institution that acts as an intermediary between domestic and international banks. Correspondent banks effectively act as an agent of a foreign bank to conduct business transactions with the domestic bank on its behalf.

What is the difference between a receiving bank and a correspondent bank? ›

Typically in the country where the transfer currency is issued, a correspondent bank operates as an agent for the foreign receiving bank (the bank that receives the funds) in the local country to process transactions.

What are the risks of correspondent banking? ›

Correspondent banks may have no pre-existing relationships with parties with which the respondent transacts, making them vulnerable to corruption and money laundering.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 6090

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.